Look at what crazy Ahmadinejad\'s up to now:http://angrysoba.blogspot.com/2010/03/911-never-happened.html\">
And it ends up with jackbooted thugs threatening to march on a mosque.Whatever half-truths may have circulated about politics in Tower Hamlets, I would hope that people on the left would now see what the line of division is here - and act accordingly.\">
\"while it has nothing to say about the thugs who advocate putting bombs on trains and in nightclubs.\"Does being muslim obviate ones class position, who exactly is \"advocat(ing) putting bombs on trains\", is it their being muslim that causes them to espouse such views, how would you explain the phenomenon Internationalist\"that if people want to practice homophobia, institutionalised misogyny, sectarianism and separatism, or even advocate terrorism\", what policies would you advocate to stem this barbarism, are all disaffected \"dis-orientated\" white working class youth supporters of womens rights and LBGT, do any of them advocate violence, at home and abroad, does any of this matter in the case of wwc youth.surely you see a problem in simply defining a group as a collection of injurious and repugnant characteristics ( is there no material analysis that might explain their attitudes, even if they are as you describe, do they have a class position, is it relevant to anything, is barbarian a class) and are you not duty bound as a result to spell out clearly how they should be dealt with, what policies over above your moralistic handwringing would you pursue in the face of the threat of islam(ism)? are you saying that there is only \"institutionalised misogyny\" in the muslim community, or does it being \"islamic\" make it more serious, like aggravated misogyny,how do you imagine \"disoriented\" muslim youth would be affected by your statements, as regards their religion, culture etc putting bombs on trains, homophobia, misogyny, terrorism, i believe you summarised it as, if they are both muslim and working class (as if such a thing were possible) how does their, please forgive me, intersectionality influence your notions of how or if they should be engaged with? \">
call for baby p\'s parents to be strung up, which is ironic considering what anti social scum they are.And the resposnible parents of those on EDL marches will have hopefully disowned their vile offspring.\">
OK so he\'s been deleted, but the idea of \'Internationalist\' justifying people who are allegedly defending \'English culture\' against \'islamism\' is just wonderful. I wonder does he have any idea of how to define \'English culture\' ? Presumably it\'s something that includes racist \'Paki-bashing\', drunken rampages in the Underground and tagging Mosques. All good traditional English stuff.\">
I\'m not sure equating the parents of these marchers with murderers and child abusers is particularly helpful either. It sounds indsicriminate, and like it isn\'t possible for generally decent, non-racist people to raise children who, for whatever reason, get involved with racist politics. When it is.That said, these are minor criticisms, and pale into insignifance compared to the threat some communities are facing from the organised, often violent far right in the form of the EDL. So keep up the good work UAF.\">
\"Good so far\"There was nothing good about that, unless it was entered in a competition to see how many demonstrably false right-wing assumptions can be packed into 1 sentence (maybe that\'s how the Sun finds it\'s writers?)\">